Compare and contrast two articles Essay

The obligates that I am going to take apart ar on the issue of a group of flower community missing to celebrate the Summer Solstice Festival in June 1986 in Hampshire and how determined jurisprudence officers were trying to stop them from doing so. Whilst both phrases argon based on the aforementioned(prenominal) issue, their use of lyric poem presents two very different viewpoints. Article 3 has a very banish bias against the flower people, describing them as harpies and giving prepossess examples of their attitude towards the police and opposite peoples property. In the word they are portrayed as harpies that spit at policemen.The lector is assumption the view that the flower people are not civilised and be admit compar up to(p) wild animals. Article 4 shows great support towards the hippies and sympathises with them. This is founder by using emotive linguistic process to create an image of the hippies as victims in society and they are treated badly by an unc aring police force. Both members use persuasive language to manoeuvre the readers attention. The clever use of personal pronouns our and we in article 3 gives the reader no option plainly to involve himself in the issue, therefore taking the side of the journalist.In contrast, article 4 does not use negative bias towards the hippies and regards them as poor and alone(predicate) people who should be given a chance in serviceman society. The journalist make unnecessarys his opening word HUNCHED in capital earn and starts the article off with a very tight word, which creates a strong dramatic effect, implying that the hippies are a lower creed of humane society who deserve pity and understanding. In article 3 the journalist uses words such as spoiled, layabouts to produce a very negative bias against the hippies, who, as the sarcastic journalist believes, use and abuse other peoples property.The phrase all at our expense, of course is besides apply to imply that the readers and author are law-abiding citizens who pay the commove for the situation created. The sympathetic descriptive language used in article 4 such as, child stumbled and burrowed deeper into the blanket immediately draws the reader into a sympathetic frame of beware. The powerful use of the rhetorical question and the redden more moving sub-heading, confusion start the article and shows how the writer has opted to take the readers views to give the hippies a chance.Emotive language in the last sentence reinforces the journalists argument that the hippies are on a road of rejection because no one has a care in the world towards them. The use of capital letters in the phrase the Child and The Man With Nowhere to Go emphasizes the course that the hippies are forced to take and draws the readers attention to the occurrence that these people are take inless makes us apprised that they dont even have the same sense of identity that a name offers to a reader. Article 3 is full of opin ions that include the reader, eg.We continue to pogey out state benefits to lawbreakers. The use of dole out makes the reader aware of how much money is actually used, or in the view of the writer wasted on lawbreakers these hippies who continue to go against the law unless still receive benefits. This creates an image of people who dont puzzle out and still spate live, because of their money. This persuades the readers to agree with the journalists comments. The article is a follow-on article it follows an article written earlier on in the workweek on the same issue.It goes as far as to refer to a newspaper report that social security employs special staff to wave around the country servicing these vagabonds (trampy style robbers who are homeless). This reinforces the opinion that people are needed just to look after these hippies because of their doubtful behaviour. In the fifth paragraph the journalist takes it into his own hands to solvent for the policeman, but he does t his unfairly (in my opinion) and uses a lot of opinion earlier than being fair and using facts.The writers use of resisted the provocation implies that the policeman would have intentionally chosen to provoke the hippies but had to resist the come-on to do so. His use of the rhetorical question to end his article invites the reader to give his/her opinion on the issue. Article 4 uses extremely descriptive words to create a vivid image in the mind of the reader. The story about the hippie and the boy totally being able to find a dog to generate some form of recognize and care, immediately implies the saying a dog is a mans best friend the writer intends for the reader to feel guilty.The emotive language draws the reader into the article. The use of the phrase hunched against the wind implies not only that the hippies are vulnerable and homeless, but even a subjective source like the wind is against them. The involvement of a child in the article immediately produces a sympatheti c response from the readers. Land that had soon been his home informs us that theyre homeless and live wherever they can survive. The journalist of article 4 doesnt give any reason or use any media sources, as article 3 did.This is in all probability because of the sympathetic view he has opted to take. Use of confusion and empty pockets tells us that poverty does occur and people around us do seek to survive the harsh real world. The policemans image is outlined as impassive and implies that he does not care. The use of the word eminent says that the policeman is of more importance than the hippie and has authority. This is a very knowing contrast to the HUNCHED image of the child at the start of the article and shows there is a massive leap from a hippie to a policeman.In paragraph five the repetition of the only implies that the hippies pass judgment any sort of affection or care shown towards them. A Labrador, a dog, which is regarded as a mans best friend, insults the ad ults of society because adults who are supposed to be a mature and sensible group deep down society cant help each other and a pet can be better than people sometimes. A heterogeneous child, a ragged, hope-crushed man and a friendly old dog, the poor and scared descriptions given to the hippies in this sentence reinforces the lifestyles they lead.The final statement every(prenominal) on the Road of Rejection reinforces the whole article. These two articles differ and take opposing, but valid views on the issue at stake. Both journalists have used persuasive techniques to manipulate and influence their readers. Both their techniques vary and both journalists write to get a point across. I would like to end my abbreviation by giving my opinion on this issue. In general I feel both journalists have given valid views on the issue.The journalists make it clear that they have different attitudes and feelings towards the hippies. They are two very rise up thought-out and clever artic les that involve the reader. I thought the techniques used by the journalists are quite clever. I think one of the reasons that the articles were written was to get the readers convolute in this particular argument. This was the aim, and I think that both the journalists succeeded in doing so.