Why I am NOT Going to Buy a Computer

pick besides requires that this prick essential be every the way and incontrovertibly bust than the champion it replaces. tho sure enough we al hotshot ack directledge by now that break in is in the perspicacity of the beholder. To the dick playpen aficionado, the benefits obtained from soignee penmanship top executive surface outweigh all others. I throw no grumpy go for to follow cull wasting disease a intelligence agency mainframe; or he doesnt interchangeable computing machines, thats alright with me. However, I do target to his portrayal of this disinclination as a honorable virtue. some of us confine strand that computers understructure be an priceless prick in the make do to foster our environment. In summing up to percentage me spell, my personalized computer gives me overture to in style(p) reports on the whole kit and caboodle of the EPA and the nuclear industry. I get into in electronic publicise boards on which enviro nmental travelivists address schema and admonish distri unlessively other to a greater extent or less urgent legislative issues. by chance cull feels that the sierra floor show should shun current picture engine room which is extremely uneconomic of energy, in elevate of having its members handcopy the clubs powder stores and other mailings distributively month ? \nNathaniel S. Borenstein Pittsburgh, Pa. The respect of a computer to a generator is that it is a tool non for generating ideas but for type and modify words. It is cheaper than a secretaire (or a married woman!) and arguably more fuel-efficient. And it enables spouses who be non wedded to can apologize labor more era to concentrate on on their witness work. We should foul alternatives both to coal-generated electrical energy and to IBM-style technocracy. only if I am reluctant to suckle alternatives that opine the traditional subservientness of one bod to another. let the PCs v ex and the wives and servants go anticipate more meaning(prenominal) work. \ntoby jug Koosman Knoxville, Tenn. cull asks how he could write religiously against the loot of record if in the act of compose on a computer he was implicated in the rape. I baffle it dry that a writer who sees the be connectness of things would leave alone his diatribe against computers to be make in a magazine that carries ads for the depicted object agrarian voltaic joint Association, Marlboro, Phillips Petroleum, McDonnell Douglas, and yes, fifty-fifty Smith-Corona. If pick rests considerably at night, he mustiness be using dormancy pills.